I'll chime in. I'm a believer that the only part/system on our motorcycles that keep the tires firmly planted on the road is the suspension. The first issue is the proper spring rate for our weight and riding style - front and rear, the second is the rebound and compression rate of the springs, and the bike sag. The OEM has to do a cost benefit scenario regarding all new motorcycles and the industry consensus is that the industry has settled on the 180 lb 5'10" rider as the middle of the road. Other industries do the same. With this in mind, when the motorcycle is new, most suspensions will work well for a certain amount of time and distance, and how the motorcycle is used, and if you purchase the motorcycle new, you adjust to the way the car rides and everything appears to work well over the years. I just changed the shocks/struts on my 2011 KIA Soul after some 120K Kms - made a significant difference. Discussion with various tire shops and parts suppliers indicated that after this many Kms, the shocks/struts are worn out and should be replaced. For my money, say some 50K miles on a motorcycle, just saying.
Checked the auto industry for this issue of scallopped/cupping of tires is predominantly because of worn out suspension. Tire shops generally have postures in the lobby explaining what is happening to tires depending on what the issue is, motorcycle shops do not. Here are a couple of pics regarding this for the auto industry:
Under inflation combined with a soft/worn out suspension are, IMO, two of the main culprits regarding this issue.
I understand the reluctance to renew/upgrade a motorcycle suspension because of expense, and there are not that many shops out there that specialize in suspensions, especially not in Canada.
The cost to renew can be prohibitive for a lot of people. I have done the suspension on four bikes I have and do own. Did the Traxion "full monty" on the 1800 I had, specifically because of the research I did into issues with the 1800. Have installed Race Tech suspension in the front forks and Progressive non-air rear shocks on my '85 Limited Edition, Progressive air shocks and fork springs in my 1500, and now doing Andreani fork cartridges (preload, rebound and spring compression/rebound adjustment) and Nitron rear shock (remote preload and spring rebound/compression adjustments) on my 2012 DL100 V-Strom. I am keeping the 1500/1200 and V-Strom so the suspension upgrade is worth it. I have some additional work to do with the 1500 regarding fork spring rate. I always do this work up front so I can enjoy what I have done or do.
There are articles on the internet that dispute what I am saying; however, when I research this issue regarding the auto industry the information is very clear on this issue.
Back to your question, and IMO, suspension and tire pressure are key to tire longevity, performance and wear. I would submit that replacing with OEM product(s) replacement may be the lowest cost and first alternative, second is Progressive and Race Tech components, then the most expensive and possibly the best is Traxion. Traxion has front fork cartridges for the 1200. There are Sonic straight rate fork springs available. rear shock possibilities are Progressive, Ohlin, and such. For the rear of my 1200 have been toying with replacing the Progressive shocks with a pair of Nitron R2 series shock - future possibility.
A good read is the Race Tech Suspension Bible.
Just my thoughts on the issue. Good luck