I have a '78 GL1000. I was told one time that the load provided by my motorcycles headlight was necessary for the proper function of the electrical system. And that there would be a negative effect on that system if I operated the motorcycle for a prolonged period of time without a headlight.
Is that true? If so, what happens, and how serious is it?
Thanks.......................Dave
Necessity for headlight load.
- Solina Dave
- Posts: 668
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2014 6:38 pm
- Location: Port Hope, Ontario, Canada
- Motorcycle: 1978 Honda Goldwing GL1000 (bought in fall of '77)
!977 Honda CB550F (my 1st motorcycle)
- tfdeputydawg
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 6:59 am
- Location: Indianapolis, In.
- Motorcycle: 06 Wing III/2010 Hannigan
Re: Necessity for headlight load.
Not true
However, most if not all states require a motorcycle to have its headlamp on at all times anyway. So ride with it on.

However, most if not all states require a motorcycle to have its headlamp on at all times anyway. So ride with it on.
- dingdong
- Posts: 4183
- Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 8:35 am
- Location: Oklahoma City
- Motorcycle: 1976 gl1000
1993 gl1500A
2004 NRX1800 Rune SOLD
Re: Necessity for headlight load.
Agree. Not true. The less the electrical load the better.
- virgilmobile
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:39 pm
- Location: Denham Springs,La.
- Motorcycle: 1988 GL1500 I
Previously owned
78 GL1000
81 GL1100
82 GL1100 I
83 GL1100 I
83 GL1100 standard
84 GL 1200 I
Re: Necessity for headlight load.
I'll poke my nose in a bit.
My gl1000 had a difficult time keeping the battery fully charged...It charged fine above 2500 rpm but I did a lot of slow in town...To alleviate this I did convert most of the lighting to LED and questioned a State Trooper about the headlight being on all the time.
At the time,the law was specific that I must have a "white light facing foreward" while the bike was on the road..
When I asked he also clarified that there was no mention in the law that it must be the bikes headlight..Any forward facing white light was legal...
I asked about using 2 white LED driving lights and leaving the headlight off.He said it was legal as long as the LED's were mounted at the correct level.They cannot be near the ground or too high.
I added the lamps..drawing about a amp and disconnected the low beam circuit to operate them.
This satisfied the law,lowered my charging strain at the lower RPM and left the high beam active.
Not the best for night time driving but I tried to make it home before that anyways.
Other wiring methods can be done to be able to select low beam or LED lights if your need should call for that feature.
My gl1000 had a difficult time keeping the battery fully charged...It charged fine above 2500 rpm but I did a lot of slow in town...To alleviate this I did convert most of the lighting to LED and questioned a State Trooper about the headlight being on all the time.
At the time,the law was specific that I must have a "white light facing foreward" while the bike was on the road..
When I asked he also clarified that there was no mention in the law that it must be the bikes headlight..Any forward facing white light was legal...
I asked about using 2 white LED driving lights and leaving the headlight off.He said it was legal as long as the LED's were mounted at the correct level.They cannot be near the ground or too high.
I added the lamps..drawing about a amp and disconnected the low beam circuit to operate them.
This satisfied the law,lowered my charging strain at the lower RPM and left the high beam active.
Not the best for night time driving but I tried to make it home before that anyways.
Other wiring methods can be done to be able to select low beam or LED lights if your need should call for that feature.
- tfdeputydawg
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 6:59 am
- Location: Indianapolis, In.
- Motorcycle: 06 Wing III/2010 Hannigan
Re: Necessity for headlight load.
However, the states can MANDATE that when you ride any motorcycle the daytime, you must have your low beam illuminated. Louisiana is one such state. Even if your motorcycle headlight does not automatically come on because it is exempt from the federal requirement, you still have to run with it on. Only difference is, it's up to you to turn it on.
- virgilmobile
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:39 pm
- Location: Denham Springs,La.
- Motorcycle: 1988 GL1500 I
Previously owned
78 GL1000
81 GL1100
82 GL1100 I
83 GL1100 I
83 GL1100 standard
84 GL 1200 I
Re: Necessity for headlight load.
This is true.That's the reason I checked with the State yrooper about thr specific law before I did this.I was in a different state back then.
Re: Necessity for headlight load.
The Goldwings sent to Europe had separate headlight switches. The regulator is capable of dumping excess loads.
- Maz
- Posts: 820
- Joined: Tue May 19, 2015 4:43 am
- Location: Kent, UK
- Motorcycle: 1975 GL1000K1
1976 CB500T
1979 CB750L
1990 Yamaha FJ1200
1993 Suzuki GS500E
Re: Necessity for headlight load.
Also we don't have the 'reserve lighting unit'. I wonder if this could be damaged by running without a headlight? I can't think of anything else that would be damaged.ekvh wrote:The Goldwings sent to Europe had separate headlight switches. The regulator is capable of dumping excess loads.
Maz
Ironically, Common Sense is the LEAST common of all senses!
- Solina Dave
- Posts: 668
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2014 6:38 pm
- Location: Port Hope, Ontario, Canada
- Motorcycle: 1978 Honda Goldwing GL1000 (bought in fall of '77)
!977 Honda CB550F (my 1st motorcycle)
Re: Necessity for headlight load.
I'm not too good at this stuff. But would the removal of the headlight load have any effect whatsoever on the regulator's performance? And if so, how would it be affected? Maybe it wouldn't. If it did, maybe it's minimal. Just wonderin'.dingdong wrote:Agree. Not true. The less the electrical load the better.
"Assume Nothing"